Critiquing a qualitative research article
In fact not all qualitative researchers report these ideas in the same way - some use the notion of trustworthiness, whereas others use the terms validity and reliability, which are actually related more to quantitative research.
It is clearly not possible to cover every aspect of a study in a journal report. The questions in frameworks for critiquing qualitative research tend to be sequential. The title does not validate or invalidate the research Parahoo and Reid These should be examined within the research report with examples quotes from each theme being given.
Rough draft qualitative research critique and ethical considerations
Introduction With regards to qualitative designs, Punch p. As practitioners gain a deeper understanding of critiquing a single piece of research, they should consider critiquing several research studies on a particular topic, searching for common themes. Discussion part of this article is consisted with findings along with limitation of the study. They could then write a critical review of the literature on that chosen topic. Within qualitative research the most common methods of data collection are interview, questionnaire or observation. Again, the value of such research to the discipline of language acquisition is relative to the approaches within the approach of using metacognitive processing data and categorizing according to cognitive frameworks. Sample in this study is clearly defined a stratified, purposive sample is used. It is also available on the internet, with more detailed questions than can be discussed within this article www. Notably, the combining of the literature review with the introduction makes it hard to distinguish between the empirical studies which form a historical context for thinking about the issues involved and the current literature that has led the researcher to formulate the specific research questions. Others, however, have been constructed to critique only one of these. The notion of qualitative non-numerical and quantitative numerical data was also introduced. By reading the author guidelines of professional journals readers are better able to determine what authors can include and therefore by implication exclude , and then relate this to the critiquing framework outlined above. Readers of qualitative research need a sound understanding of the terminology specific to this type of research to make full sense of the report. Therefore, the researcher could be seen to be trying to verify her own beliefs about teaching approaches and how to assist learners in becoming better listeners and to support what certain others have suggested, namely Field on p.
Is the introduction well organized and clear? By reading the author guidelines of professional journals readers are better able to determine what authors can include and therefore by implication excludeand then relate this to the critiquing framework outlined above.
Once the data has been analysed thoroughly, the findings should be clearly displayed.
based on 51 review